Robotic CT-guided out-of-plane needle insertion: comparison of angle accuracy with manual insertion in phantom and measurement of distance accuracy in animals.
Toshiyuki KomakiTakao HirakiTetsushi KamegawaTakayuki MatsunoJun SakuraiRyutaro MatsuuraTakuya YamaguchiTakanori SasakiToshiharu MitsuhashiSoichiro OkamotoMayu UkaYusuke MatsuiToshihiro IguchiHideo GobaraSusumu KanazawaPublished in: European radiology (2019)
• Out-of-plane needle insertions performed using our robot were more accurate than smartphone-guided manual insertions in the phantom experiment and were also accurate in the in vivo procedure. • In the phantom experiment, the mean angle errors of the robotic and smartphone-guided manual out-of-plane needle insertions were 0.4° and 3.7° in the XY plane (p < 0.001) and 0.6° and 0.6° in the YZ plane (p = 0.65), respectively. • In the animal experiment, the overall mean distance accuracies of the robotic out-of-plane needle insertions with and without adjustments of needle orientation during insertion were 2.5 mm and 5.0 mm, respectively.