Unraveling σ and π Effects on Magnetic Anisotropy in cis-NiA4 B2 Complexes: Magnetization, HF-HFEPR Studies, First-Principles Calculations, and Orbital Modeling.
Gaëlle CharronElena MalkinGuillaume RogezLuke J BatchelorSandra MazeratRégis GuillotNathalie GuihéryAnne-Laure BarraTalal MallahHélène BolvinPublished in: Chemistry (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) (2016)
By using complementary experimental techniques and first-principles theoretical calculations, magnetic anisotropy in a series of five hexacoordinated nickel(II) complexes possessing a symmetry close to C2v , has been investigated. Four complexes have the general formula [Ni(bpy)X2 ]n+ (bpy=2,2'-bipyridine; X2 =bpy (1), (NCS- )2 (2), C2 O42- (3), NO3- (4)). In the fifth complex, [Ni(HIM2 -py)2 (NO3 )]+ (5; HIM2 -py=2-(2-pyridyl)-4,4,5,5-tetramethyl-4,5-dihydro-1H-imidazolyl-1-hydroxy), which was reported previously, the two bpy bidentate ligands were replaced by HIM2 -py. Analysis of the high-field, high-frequency electronic paramagnetic resonance (HF-HFEPR) spectra and magnetization data leads to the determination of the spin Hamiltonian parameters. The D parameter, corresponding to the axial magnetic anisotropy, was negative (Ising type) for the five compounds and ranged from -1 to -10 cm-1 . First-principles SO-CASPT2 calculations have been performed to estimate these parameters and rationalize the experimental values. From calculations, the easy axis of magnetization is in two different directions for complexes 2 and 3, on one hand, and 4 and 5, on the other hand. A new method is proposed to calculate the g tensor for systems with S=1. The spin Hamiltonian parameters (D (axial), E (rhombic), and gi ) are rationalized in terms of ordering of the 3 d orbitals. According to this orbital model, it can be shown that 1) the large magnetic anisotropy of 4 and 5 arises from splitting of the eg -like orbitals and is due to the difference in the σ-donor strength of NO3- and bpy or HIM2 -py, whereas the difference in anisotropy between the two compounds is due to splitting of the t2g -like orbitals; and 2) the anisotropy of complexes 1-3 arises from the small splitting of the t2g -like orbitals. The direction of the anisotropy axis can be rationalized by the proposed orbital model.