Complications of Temporary Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support for Cardiogenic Shock: An Appraisal of Contemporary Literature.
Anna V SubramaniamGregory W BarsnessSaarwaani VallabhajosyulaSaraschandra VallabhajosyulaPublished in: Cardiology and therapy (2019)
Cardiogenic shock (CS) is associated with hemodynamic compromise and end-organ hypoperfusion due to a primary cardiac etiology. In addition to vasoactive medications, percutaneous mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices offer the ability to support the hemodynamics and prevent acute organ failure. Despite the wide array of available MCS devices for CS, there are limited data on the complications from these devices. In this review, we seek to summarize the complications of MCS devices in the contemporary era. Using a systems-based approach, this review covers domains of hematological, neurological, vascular, infectious, mechanical, and miscellaneous complications. These data are intended to provide a balanced narrative and aid in risk-benefit decision-making in this acutely ill population.
Keyphrases
- risk factors
- electronic health record
- minimally invasive
- liver failure
- systematic review
- ultrasound guided
- extracorporeal membrane oxygenation
- big data
- heart failure
- left ventricular
- radiofrequency ablation
- high throughput
- intensive care unit
- machine learning
- mass spectrometry
- aortic dissection
- deep learning
- high density
- mechanical ventilation