We Know What You Agreed To, Don't We?-Evaluating the Quality of Paper-Based Consents Forms and Their Digitalized Equivalent Using the Example of the Baltic Fracture Competence Centre Project.

 All quality issues could be assigned to one predefined criterion. Using the example of the BFCC fracture registry, CF-QA proved to significantly increase CF quality and help retain the number of available datasets for research. Consequently, the described quality indicators, criteria, and QA processes can be seen as the best practice approach.