Decision Support Needs for Patients with Severe Symptomatic Aortic Stenosis.
M Pilar IngleAdam M CarrollDaniel D MatlockKristy D GamaJavier A ValleLarry A AllenChristopher E KnoepkePublished in: Journal of gerontological social work (2021)
Social workers in healthcare settings often support patient decision-making processes for complex medical decisions. The objective of this study was to examine decision support needs for patients considering aortic valve replacement (AVR) for aortic stenosis. Seventeen qualitative interviews were conducted to explore treatment decision experiences of patients who accepted AVR. Analysis was conducted using a mixed inductive-deductive approach. Fear was a prevalent response for most participants in the face of AVR. Two general paths of decision making emerged: an "active" information seeking approach, or a "passive" simplicity seeking approach. Patients with unique clinical presentations felt alienated by the decision-making process. Acknowledging fear while understanding different decision-making styles provide opportunities for social workers and other members of multidisciplinary teams to support complex patient decisions.
Keyphrases
- aortic stenosis
- decision making
- ejection fraction
- aortic valve replacement
- healthcare
- transcatheter aortic valve implantation
- transcatheter aortic valve replacement
- aortic valve
- mental health
- left ventricular
- coronary artery disease
- case report
- end stage renal disease
- chronic kidney disease
- health information
- prognostic factors
- prefrontal cortex
- social media
- atrial fibrillation