Login / Signup

Development and Validation of a Contrast-Enhanced US VI-RADS for Evaluating Muscle Invasion in Bladder Cancer.

Jing HanMin LinQingguang LinRuohan GuoYing LiaoZhiming WuYunlin YeZhi-Xing GuoKai YaoLingling LiJian-Hua Zhou
Published in: Radiology (2024)
Background Contrast-enhanced US (CEUS) can be used preoperatively for evaluating muscle invasion in bladder cancer, which is important for determining appropriate treatment. However, diagnostic criteria for assessing this at CEUS have not been standardized. Purpose To develop and validate a CEUS Vesical Imaging Reporting and Data System (VI-RADS) for evaluating muscle invasion in bladder cancer. Materials and Methods This single-center prospective study consecutively enrolled patients with suspected bladder cancer. Participants underwent transabdominal or intracavity CEUS between July 2021 and May 2023. Participants were divided into a training set and a validation set at a 2:1 ratio based on the chronologic order of enrollment. The training set was used to identify major imaging features to include in CEUS VI-RADS, and the likelihood of muscle invasion per category was determined using a pathologic reference standard. The optimal VI-RADS category cutoff for muscle invasion was determined with use of the maximum Youden index. The validation set was assessed by novice and expert readers and used to validate the diagnostic performance and interreader agreement of the developed system. Results Overall, 126 participants (median age, 64 years [IQR, 57-71 years]; 107 male) and 67 participants (median age, 64 years [IQR, 56-69 years]; 49 male) were included in the training and validation set, respectively. In the training set, the optimal CEUS VI-RADS category cutoff for muscle invasion was VI-RADS 4 or higher (Youden index, 0.77). In the validation set, CEUS VI-RADS achieved good performance for both novice and expert readers (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.80 [95% CI: 0.70, 0.90] vs 0.88 [95% CI: 0.80, 0.97]; P = .09). The interreader agreement regarding the evaluation of CEUS VI-RADS category was 0.77 (95% CI: 0.65, 0.85) for novice readers, 0.87 (95% CI: 0.79, 0.92) for expert readers, and 0.78 (95% CI: 0.70, 0.84) for all readers. Conclusion The developed CEUS VI-RADS showed good performance and interreader agreement for the assessment of muscle invasion in bladder cancer. Chinese Clinical Trial Registry no. ChiCTR2100049435 © RSNA, 2024 Supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Morrell in this issue.
Keyphrases