Effects of feeding a negative dietary cation and anion difference diet to twin-bearing Merino ewes in late gestation on parturition outcomes.
Amy Laurel MunnWilliam Hej van WettereAlyce Marie SwinbourneIan John LeanAlice Caroline WeaverPublished in: Journal of animal science (2024)
In Australia, dystocia is responsible for 53% of lamb mortalities, and calcium deficiencies may be a contributing factor. A negative dietary cation anion difference (DCAD) diet can increase calcium concentrations in sheep. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the effects of a negative DCAD diet on metabolic state, mineral status and parturition duration in ewes compared with those fed a positive DCAD diet. At approximately day 130 of gestation (dG), 71 twin-bearing ewes were placed in the following treatment groups; ewes receiving a positive DCAD TMR (total mixed ration) (DCAD of total diet = 281.8 mEq/kg DM; n = 35) and twin-bearing ewes receiving a negative DCAD TMR (DCAD of total diet = -89.0 mEq/kg DM; n = 36). Urine and blood were sampled on dG 130, 140, and 145, and blood was also sampled at the onset of parturition and 4 h post-partum. Urine was analysed for pH and blood was analysed for metabolites, mineral concentration and acid-base balance. Lamb liveweight, rectal temperature, blood glucose and lactate, and body morphology were measured. Serum phosphate concentrations at dG 145 were significantly lower for negative DCAD ewes compared with positive DCAD ewes (1.9 ± 0.1 versus 2.1 ± 0.1 mmol/L, P = 0.047). Ionised calcium (P = 0.09) and serum magnesium (P = 0.09) pre-partum were marginally greater in the negative DCAD ewes (1.35 ± 0.06 and 1.06 ± 0.03 mmol/L respectively) compared with the positive DCAD ewes (1.18 ± 0.08 and 0.98 ± 0.04 mmol/L respectively). Urine pH was lower in the negative DCAD ewes compared with positive DCAD ewes at both dG 140 (7.38 ± 0.17 versus and 8.10 ± 0.19. P = 0.01) and dG 145 (and 7.20 ± 0.19 versus 8.25. P < 0.01). The birth interval between the first the second-born lamb was shorter in the negative DCAD ewes compared with the positive DCAD ewes (P = 0.02), but no differences in lamb survival or lamb viability (P > 0.05) were seen. The negative DCAD diet reduced parturition duration, most likely due to the marginally greater ionised calcium and magnesium concentrations. Despite this improvement, the negate DCAD ewes did not reach urinary acidification, indicating that the marginally significant greater ionised calcium and serum magnesium concentrations was due to the magnesium in the diets and not metabolic acidosis. Further research testing a negative DCAD diet that can achieve the target urine pH is required to determine whether this diet can decrease parturition duration and improve lamb viability.