Use of hierarchical models to analyze European trends in congenital anomaly prevalence.
Alana CavadinoDavid Prieto-MerinoMarie-Claude AddorLarraitz ArriolaFabrizio BianchiElizabeth DraperEster GarneRuth GreenleesMartin HaeuslerBabak KhoshnoodJenny KurinczukBob McDonnellVera NelenMary O'MahonyHanitra RandrianaivoJudith RankinAnke RissmannDavid TuckerChristine Verellen-DumoulinHermien de WalleDiana WellesleyJoan K MorrisPublished in: Birth defects research. Part A, Clinical and molecular teratology (2017)
There were no substantial differences between independent analyses of each subgroup and hierarchical models when using the EUROCAT anomaly subgroups. Considering each anomaly separately, therefore, remains an appropriate method for the detection of potential changes in prevalence by surveillance systems. Hierarchical models do, however, remain an interesting alternative method of analysis when considering the risks of specific exposures in relation to the prevalence of congenital anomalies, which could be investigated in other studies. Birth Defects Research (Part A) 106:480-10, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.