The Defibrillation Conundrum: New Insights into the Mechanisms of Shock-Related Myocardial Injury Sustained from a Life-Saving Therapy.
Nicolas ClementyAlexandre BodinArnaud BissonAna-Paula Teixeira-GomesSébastien RogerDenis AngoulvantValérie LabasDominique BabutyPublished in: International journal of molecular sciences (2021)
Implantable cardiac defibrillators (ICDs) are recommended to prevent the risk of sudden cardiac death. However, shocks are associated with an increased mortality with a dose response effect, and a strategy of reducing electrical therapy burden improves the prognosis of implanted patients. We review the mechanisms of defibrillation and its consequences, including cell damage, metabolic remodeling, calcium metabolism anomalies, and inflammatory and pro-fibrotic remodeling. Electrical shocks do save lives, but also promote myocardial stunning, heart failure, and pro-arrhythmic effects as seen in electrical storms. Limiting unnecessary implantations and therapies and proposing new methods of defibrillation in the future are recommended.
Keyphrases
- cardiac arrest
- heart failure
- left ventricular
- end stage renal disease
- oxidative stress
- ejection fraction
- newly diagnosed
- chronic kidney disease
- cardiac resynchronization therapy
- cell therapy
- single cell
- peritoneal dialysis
- prognostic factors
- type diabetes
- current status
- risk factors
- systemic sclerosis
- cardiovascular disease
- idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis
- bone marrow
- stem cells
- patient reported