Login / Signup

Vive la difference: Factors and mechanisms predicting discrepancy between iFR and FFR.

Morton J KernArnold H Seto
Published in: Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions (2020)
FFR/iFR is discordant in 15-20% of cases, at times causing confusion about revascularization decisions. The CONTRAST substudy identifies lesion location, lesion severity, and bradycardia as major predictors for FFR/iFR discordance, with age a minor predictor. Each of these predictors can be explained physiologically through the mechanisms related to resting and hyperemic pressure loss across different patterns of atherosclerotic stenoses. A logical approach to using both resting and hyperemic pressure ratios is proposed.
Keyphrases
  • heart rate
  • heart rate variability
  • magnetic resonance
  • genome wide
  • coronary artery bypass grafting
  • blood pressure
  • coronary artery disease
  • dna methylation
  • contrast enhanced
  • acute coronary syndrome
  • drug induced