According to recent work group recommendations, individuals with the serologic weak D phenotypes should be RHD genotyped and individuals with molecular weak D types 1, 2, 3, 4.0, or 4.1 should be treated as D+. We report an African American woman with a long-standing history of metrorrhagia, who presented for infertility evaluation. Blood grouping showed AB with a possible subgroup of A, based on mixed-field agglutination, and a serologic weak D phenotype. Results from routine red cell genotyping for the RHD gene was incongruent with the serologic RhCE phenotype. For the surgical procedure, the patient was hence scheduled to receive group AB, D- RBC transfusions. Subsequent molecular analysis identified the ABO*A2.01 and ABO*B.01 alleles for the ABO genotype and the novel RHD allele [ NG_007494.1(RHD):c.611T>A ] along with an RHD*09.01.02 allele for the RHD genotype. Using a panel of monoclonal anti-D reagents, we showed the novel RHD(I204K) allele to represent a serologic weak D phenotype, despite occurring as a compound heterozygote, designated RHD*weak D type 161 ( RHD*01W.161 ). Individuals with a weak D type 4.2 allele are prone to anti-D immunization, while the immunization potential of novel RHD alleles is difficult to predict. For now, patients should be treated as D- in transfusion and pregnancy management, when they harbor a novel RHD allele along with any weak D allele other than weak D types 1, 2, 3, 4.0 , or 4.1 . This study exemplifies strategies for how and when a laboratory should proceed from routine genotyping to nucleotide sequencing before any decisions on transfusion practice is made.