Safety and efficacy of intracoronary thrombolytic agents during primary percutaneous coronary intervention for STEMI.
Natasha KulickKevin FriedeGeorge A StoufferPublished in: Expert review of cardiovascular therapy (2023)
Published studies are limited by small sample size and heterogeneity due to variation in indication, inclusion criteria, thrombolytic agent, dose, delivery mechanisms, antiplatelet and anticoagulant regimen, timing in regard to reperfusion, PCI techniques and endpoints. Despite these limitations, data are consistent that IC administration of thrombolytic agents at low doses is associated with low rates of bleeding and vascular complications. While there is currently no compelling data demonstrating a benefit to the routine use of IC thrombolytic therapy in patients with STEMI, there is suggestive data that IC thrombolysis may have benefit in selected patients.
Keyphrases
- percutaneous coronary intervention
- pulmonary embolism
- acute ischemic stroke
- st elevation myocardial infarction
- st segment elevation myocardial infarction
- acute myocardial infarction
- atrial fibrillation
- electronic health record
- acute coronary syndrome
- antiplatelet therapy
- coronary artery disease
- end stage renal disease
- coronary artery bypass grafting
- big data
- chronic kidney disease
- ejection fraction
- venous thromboembolism
- peritoneal dialysis
- stem cells
- clinical practice
- systematic review
- single cell
- patient reported outcomes
- case control
- subarachnoid hemorrhage
- blood brain barrier
- replacement therapy