Exploring causality in the association between circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D and colorectal cancer risk: a large Mendelian randomisation study.
Yazhou HeMaria TimofeevaSusan M FarringtonPeter Vaughan-ShawVictoria SvintiMarion WalkerLina ZgagaXiangrui MengXue LiAthina SpiliopoulouXia JiangElina HyppönenPeter KraftDouglas P Kielnull nullCaroline HaywardArchie CampbellDavid PorteousKatarina VucicIva KiracMasa FilipovicSarah E HarrisIan J DearyRichard HoulstonIan P TomlinsonHarry CampbellEvropi TheodoratouMalcolm G DunlopPublished in: BMC medicine (2018)
Despite the scale of this study and employing an improved score capturing more of the genetic contribution to circulating 25-OHD, we found no evidence for a causal relationship between circulating 25-OHD and CRC risk. Although the magnitude of effect for vitamin D suggested by observational studies can confidently be excluded, smaller effects sizes and non-linear relationships remain plausible. Circulating vitamin D may be a CRC biomarker, but a causal effect on CRC risk remains unproven.
Keyphrases