Lung function parameters are associated with acute mountain sickness and are improved at high and extreme altitude.
Reto ReiserAnne-Kathrin BrillChristos T NakasUrs HeftiDavid BergerEveline Perret HoignéHans-Joachim KabitzTobias M MerzJacqueline Pichler HeftiPublished in: Respiratory physiology & neurobiology (2024)
At altitude, factors such as decreased barometric pressure, low temperatures, and acclimatization might affect lung function. The effects of exposure and acclimatization to high-altitude on lung function were assessed in 39 subjects by repetitive spirometry up to 6022 m during a high-altitude expedition. Subjects were classified depending on the occurrence of acute mountain sickness (AMS) and summit success to evaluate whether lung function relates to successful climb and risk of developing AMS. Peak expiratory flow (PEF), forced vital capacity (FVC) and forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) increased with progressive altitude (max. +20.2 %pred, +9.3 %pred, and +6.7 %pred, all p<0.05). Only PEF improved with acclimatization (BC1 vs. BC2, +7.2 %pred, p=0.044). At altitude FEV1 (p=0.008) and PEF (p<0.001) were lower in the AMS group. The risk of developing AMS was associated with lower baseline PEF (p<0.001) and longitudinal changes in PEF (p=0.008) and FEV1 (p<0.001). Lung function was not related to summit success (7126 m). Improvement in PEF after acclimatization might indicate respiratory muscle adaptation.