Valve-in-valve-in-valve: Balloon expandable transcatheter heart valve in failing self-expandable transcatheter heart valve in deteriorated surgical bioprosthesis.
Andreas SchaeferFlorian DeuschlLenard ConradiUlrich SchäferPublished in: Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions (2018)
Valve-in-valve (ViV) procedures for failing bioprostheses carry a certain risk for device malfunction. We herein report a case of a failing Evolut R in a deteriorated Mitroflow, treated with a Sapien 3. An 81 year old female patient received surgical aortic valve replacement and was treated by ViV due to deterioration. Three years later, echocardiography revealed a pressure gradient of peak/mean 105/63 mmHg. Subsequently, a second ViV procedure with initial intentional rupture of the bioprosthetic stent was performed. Immediate stent recoil of the Evolut R prompted implantation of a Sapien 3. In 30-day follow-up, mean pressure gradient of 30 mmHg and nearly complete symptom relief was documented. Fracture of a surgical bioprosthetic stent is feasible in a ViV configuration. Supra-annular placement of a balloon-expandable THV as ViV-in-valve is feasible with suboptimal hemodynamic results in this case. Risk of re-do surgery should be weighted against anticipated hemodynamic and clinical results.
Keyphrases
- aortic valve
- aortic valve replacement
- transcatheter aortic valve implantation
- aortic stenosis
- transcatheter aortic valve replacement
- mitral valve
- ejection fraction
- left ventricular
- heart failure
- minimally invasive
- pulmonary hypertension
- magnetic resonance imaging
- single cell
- atrial fibrillation
- acute coronary syndrome
- computed tomography
- magnetic resonance
- percutaneous coronary intervention
- ultrasound guided