Limited impact of lifting universal masks on SARS-CoV-2 transmission in schools: The crucial role of outcome measurements.
Mingwei LiBingyi YangBenjamin John CowlingPublished in: PNAS nexus (2024)
Amid the COVID-19 pandemic, education systems globally implemented protective measures, notably mandatory mask wearing. As the pandemic's dynamics changed, many municipalities lifted these mandates, warranting a critical examination of these policy changes' implications. This study examines the effects of lifting mask mandates on COVID-19 transmission within Massachusetts school districts. We first replicated previous research that utilized a difference-in-difference (DID) model for COVID-19 incidence. We then repeated the DID analysis by replacing the outcome measurement with the reproductive number ( R t ), reflecting the transmissibility. Due to the data availability, the R t we estimated only measures the within school transmission. We found a similar result in the replication using incidence with an average treatment effect on treated (ATT) of 39.1 (95% CI: 20.4 to 57.4) COVID-19 cases per 1,000 students associated with lifting masking mandates. However, when replacing the outcome measurement to R t , our findings suggest that no significant association between lifting mask mandates and reduced R t (ATT: 0.04, 95% CI: -0.09 to 0.18), except for the first 2 weeks postintervention. Moreover, we estimated R t below 1 at 4 weeks before lifting mask mandates across all school types, suggesting nonsustainable transmission before the implementation. Our reanalysis suggested no evidence of lifting mask mandates in schools impacted the COVID-19 transmission in the long term. Our study highlights the importance of examining the transmissibility outcome when evaluating interventions against transmission.