Login / Signup

Long-Term Outcomes of Open Versus Endovascular Treatment for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis With Reconstructed Time-to-Event Data.

Georgios LoufopoulosPanagiotis TasoudisGeorgios KoudounasIoannis ZoupasNikolaos MadourosMichel Pompeu SáChristos D KarkosStefanos GiannopoulosApostolos K Tassiopoulos
Published in: Journal of endovascular therapy : an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists (2023)
Open surgical repair for uncomplicated abdominal aortic aneurysm offers better long-term outcomes in terms of survival and freedom from reintervention rate compared to the endovascular approach but in the first year it carries a higher risk of mortality. The novelty of our study lies that instead of comparing study-level effect estimates, we analyzed reconstructed individual patient-level data. This offered us the opportunity to perform our analyses with mathematically robust and flexible survival models, which was proved to be crucial since there was evidence of different hazard over time. Our findings underline the need for additional investigation to clarify the significance of open surgical repair when compared to the latest endovascular devices and techniques within the evolving era of minimally invasive procedures.
Keyphrases
  • abdominal aortic aneurysm
  • minimally invasive
  • endovascular treatment
  • electronic health record
  • big data
  • cardiovascular disease
  • cardiovascular events
  • risk factors
  • data analysis
  • urinary tract infection