Login / Signup

Quality versus emergency: How good were ventilation fittings produced by additive manufacturing to address shortages during the COVID19 pandemic?

Roman Hossein KhonsariMathilde OrangerPierre-Marc FrançoisAlexis Mendoza-RuizKarl LerouxGhilas BoussaidDelphine PrieurJean-Pierre HodgeAntoine BelleVincent MidlerCapucine Morelot-PanziniMaxime PatoutJésus Gonzalez-Bermejo
Published in: PloS one (2022)
3D-printing is a valid technology to produce ventilation devices but requires care in the choice of printing methods, raw materials, and post-treatment procedures. Even in a context of sanitary crisis, devices produced outside hospitals should be used only after professional quality control, with precise data available on printing protocols. The mechanical properties of ventilation devices are crucial for efficient ventilation, avoiding rebreathing of CO2, and preventing the dispersion of viral particles that can contaminate health professionals. Specific norms are still required to formalise quality control procedures for ventilation fittings, with the rise of 3D-printing initiatives and the perspective of new pandemics.
Keyphrases