[Health economic evaluation of an internal medicine intermediate care unit (IMC) with gastroenterological focus at a maximum care university hospital - Evaluating the Profitability of Intermediate Care (IMC) in modern University Hospital Gastroenterology].

Intermediate care (IMC) units meet the complex treatment needs of patients with specific diseases and/or those requiring advanced nursing care and can help turning the occupancy management of intensive care unit (ICU) beds more efficient. Despite the exclusion of nursing staff costs from the Diagnosis-Related-Groups (DRG) reimbursement system, prolonged periods of below-average monthly revenues due to loss of complex DRGs and/or misallocation/blocking of IMC beds can lead to a fixed cost refinancing problem; this again brings to the fore the question of the profitability of an IMC unit. Thus, the aim of this work has been to evaluate the profitability of a gastroenterological IMC, as part of an interdisciplinary medical IMC (MIMC) at the University Hospital Essen, for the period 01.01.2014-31.12.2016. Retrospectively, 1015 cases of the MIMC ward of the Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (Med.G./MIMC; N=12 beds) were examined with regard to length of stay (LoS), admission/main diagnosis, procedures provided as well as secondary diagnoses, revenues, age, and sex (median patient age 57 years; ♂ 61%, ♀ 39%). Overall, 85% of DRG reimbursements comes from treatment cases within the top 20 base DRGs; these highlight the hepatology focus of Med.G./MIMC. The case-mix (CM) monthly average is 65; the CM index (CMI), which has significant seasonal variation (analogous to CM), monthly average is 10.891 (2014-2016). The average LoS on the Med.G./MIMC is 12.3 days, which is significantly higher than the average LoS in German hospitals (7.2 days). Concrete economic assessment of Med.G./MIMC reveals that the inpatient revenues increase from € 2.90 million to € 3.72 million (2014-2016). Thus, there is a positive development of primary revenues from € 2.98 million (2014) to € 3.56 million (2015) to € 3.81 million (2016), with largely constant expenses in the area of primary costs and of claimed secondary services. Empirically, taking into account the potential interdisciplinary synergy effects, this can be considered as an exceptionally good health economic development/outcome.