Oncologic outcomes of minimally invasive versus open radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical carcinoma and tumor size <2 cm: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Dimitrios NasioudisBenjamin B AlbrightEmily M KoAshley F HaggertyRobert L Giuntoli IiSarah H KimMark A MorganNawar A LatifPublished in: International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society (2021)
Based on a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis of studies that control for confounders, for patients with cervical cancer and tumor size <2 cm, minimally invasive radical hysterectomy was associated with worse progression-free survival than laparotomy.