Patients with Positive Lymph Nodes after Radical Prostatectomy and Pelvic Lymphadenectomy-Do We Know the Proper Way of Management?
Bartosz MalkiewiczMiłosz KnuraMałgorzata ŁątkowskaMaximilian KobylańskiKrystian NagiDawid JanczakJoanna ChorbińskaWojciech KrajewskiJakub KarwackiTomasz SzydełkoPublished in: Cancers (2022)
Lymph node invasion in prostate cancer is a significant prognostic factor indicating worse prognosis. While it significantly affects both survival rates and recurrence, proper management remains a controversial and unsolved issue. The thorough evaluation of risk factors associated with nodal involvement, such as lymph node density or extracapsular extension, is crucial to establish the potential expansion of the disease and to substratify patients clinically. There are multiple strategies that may be employed for patients with positive lymph nodes. Nowadays, therapeutic methods are generally based on observation, radiotherapy, and androgen deprivation therapy. However, the current guidelines are incoherent in terms of the most effective management approach. Future management strategies are expected to make use of novel diagnostic tools and therapies, such as photodynamic therapy or diagnostic imaging with prostate-specific membrane antigen. Nevertheless, this heterogeneous group of men remains a great therapeutic concern, and both the clarification of the guidelines and the optimal substratification of patients are required.
Keyphrases
- lymph node
- prostate cancer
- radical prostatectomy
- prognostic factors
- neoadjuvant chemotherapy
- end stage renal disease
- sentinel lymph node
- photodynamic therapy
- newly diagnosed
- chronic kidney disease
- early stage
- peritoneal dialysis
- computed tomography
- magnetic resonance
- magnetic resonance imaging
- locally advanced
- fluorescence imaging
- diffusion weighted
- middle aged
- patient reported