Comparing the Safety and Feasibility of Endovascular Therapy via Transradial and Transfemoral Approaches in Patients with Aortoiliac Occlusive Disease: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of the Nationwide Registry.
Kazunori HorieMitsuyoshi TakaharaOsamu IidaShun KohsakaTatsuya NakamaToshiro ShinkeNorio TadaTetsuya AmanoKen KozumaPublished in: Journal of endovascular therapy : an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists (2023)
The efficacy of transradial approach (TRA) is established in percutaneous coronary intervention; however, its safety and feasibility are unclear in endovascular therapy (EVT). We analyzed 9,671 cases with symptomatic aortoiliac occlusive disease treated using EVT from a Nationwide Registry to compare the 30-day outcomes of those who received EVT only via TRA (n = 863 [16.9%]and those only via TFA (n=4,255 [83.1%]) by using propensity score matching. Technical success rate (99.3% vs. 99.3%, p > 0.99) and 30-day complications (0.2% vs. 0.7%, p = 0.29) were comparable between the two groups. EVT via TRA could be performed safely.
Keyphrases
- percutaneous coronary intervention
- st segment elevation myocardial infarction
- acute myocardial infarction
- acute coronary syndrome
- coronary artery disease
- st elevation myocardial infarction
- antiplatelet therapy
- coronary artery bypass grafting
- sickle cell disease
- transcatheter aortic valve replacement
- atrial fibrillation
- type diabetes
- aortic valve replacement
- transcatheter aortic valve implantation
- left ventricular
- stem cells
- coronary artery bypass
- skeletal muscle
- mesenchymal stem cells
- adipose tissue
- aortic valve
- glycemic control
- newly diagnosed
- weight loss