Do thrombolysis outcomes differ between anterior circulation stroke and posterior circulation stroke? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Sang-Hun LeeJung Hoon HanIleok JungJin-Man JungPublished in: International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society (2020)
Safety and efficacy of thrombolysis in posterior circulation stroke depends on involvement of large vessel occlusion and reperfusion modality such that intravenous thrombolytics is more effective and safer than in anterior circulation stroke; the safety and efficacy of intra-arterial treatment is comparable or lower than anterior circulation stroke. Considering the limitations of our meta-analysis, further studies are needed to provide high level evidence of a beneficial effect of intra-arterial treatment, and to identify patients' profiles associated with benefit of treatment.
Keyphrases
- atrial fibrillation
- systematic review
- pulmonary embolism
- end stage renal disease
- acute ischemic stroke
- newly diagnosed
- chronic kidney disease
- type diabetes
- heart failure
- metabolic syndrome
- high dose
- combination therapy
- prognostic factors
- skeletal muscle
- acute coronary syndrome
- left ventricular
- blood brain barrier
- case control
- peritoneal dialysis
- replacement therapy
- patient reported