Pediatric Ventilation Skills by Non-Healthcare Students: Effectiveness, Self-Perception, and Preference.
Santiago Martinez-IsasiCristina Jorge-SotoCecilia Castro-FernándezClara Baltar-LorenzoMaría-Jesús SobridoJose Manteiga-UrbónRoberto Barcala-FurelosPublished in: International journal of environmental research and public health (2023)
Since a great number of infant cardiopulmonary arrests occur outside of the hospital, it is crucial to train laypersons in cardiopulmonary resuscitation techniques, especially those professionals that will work with infants and children. The main objective of this study was to evaluate the efectiveness of ventilations performed by professional training students. The secondary objective was to analyze the preference between different ventilation and chest-compression methods. The sample consisted of 32 professional training students, 15 preschool students, and 17 physical education students. The activity was conducted separately for each group, and we provided a 10 min theoretical training about infant basic life support followed by a 45 min practical training using a Laerdal Little Anne QCPR CPR manikin. A practical test in pairs was organized to record the ventilation as performed by the participants, establishing the difference between the efficacious and the non-efficacious ones. Furthermore, we handed out a survey before and after training to evaluate their knowledge. More than 90% of the students completely agreed with the importance of learning cardiopulmonary resuscitation techniques for their professional future. More than half of the sample considered that they perform the rescue breathings with the mouth-to-mouth method better. We observed that through mouth-to-mouth-nose ventilations, the number of effective ventilations was significantly higher than the effective ventilations provided by a self-inflating bag and mask (EffectiveMtoMN 6.42 ± 4.27 vs. EffectiveMask 4.75 ± 3.63 ( p = 0.007)), which was the preferred method. In terms of the compression method, hands encircling the chest was preferred by more than 85% of students. Mouth-to-mouth nose ventilation is more efficient than bag-face-mask ventilation in CPR as performed by professional training and physical activity students. This fact must be considered to provide higher-quality training sessions to professional training students.
Keyphrases
- cardiopulmonary resuscitation
- cardiac arrest
- high school
- healthcare
- virtual reality
- physical activity
- respiratory failure
- emergency department
- mechanical ventilation
- body mass index
- obstructive sleep apnea
- depressive symptoms
- high resolution
- quality improvement
- high speed
- sleep quality
- health insurance
- extracorporeal membrane oxygenation
- drug induced