Login / Signup

Multi-directional communication between decision makers and environmental health researchers: a qualitative inquiry.

Carrie LeachAmy J SchulzNicholas SchroeckSusie LawrenceSharon SandGuy WilliamsOluwatosin A BewajiRobin Fuchs-Young
Published in: Environmental hazards (Amsterdam, Netherlands) (2023)
It has been three decades since key leaders gathered to pave a path toward healthier and more just environments and recommendations were made to improve communication between scientists and community stakeholders who can influence decision making. Since that time, community engaged research has flourished while building the capacity of researchers to engage in the work of making change to those environments has lagged. The purpose of this study was the development of guidelines to inform interactions between researchers and decision makers and influencers who participate in the policy change process. This community engaged, pragmatic and iterative inquiry includes insight from a review of existing resources and key informant interviews. Resulting guidelines were piloted, and formative evaluation by community stakeholders informed and resulted in refinement to the guidelines. Strategies for communicating and disseminating scientific evidence are presented as well as tactics that sensitise researchers to the nuances of policy makers' realities so they may serve as a resource for dealing with complex information and decisions. We provide tactics and archived resources in an on-line toolkit that we have cultivated over time to foster effective communication between scientists and those who have a stake in ensuring that decisions are evidence informed.
Keyphrases
  • healthcare
  • mental health
  • decision making
  • public health
  • clinical practice
  • magnetic resonance imaging
  • computed tomography
  • clinical trial
  • image quality