Login / Signup

Differentially charged nanoplastics demonstrate distinct accumulation in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Xiao-Dong SunXian-Zheng YuanYuebin JiaLi-Juan FengFan-Ping ZhuShang-Shang DongJiajia LiuXiangpei KongHuiyu TianJian-Lu DuanZhaojun DingShu-Guang WangBaoshan Xing
Published in: Nature nanotechnology (2020)
Although the fates of microplastics (0.1-5 mm in size) and nanoplastics (<100 nm) in marine environments are being increasingly well studied1,2, little is known about the behaviour of nanoplastics in terrestrial environments3-6, especially agricultural soils7. Previous studies have evaluated the consequences of nanoplastic accumulation in aquatic plants, but there is no direct evidence for the internalization of nanoplastics in terrestrial plants. Here, we show that both positively and negatively charged nanoplastics can accumulate in Arabidopsis thaliana. The aggregation promoted by the growth medium and root exudates limited the uptake of amino-modified polystyrene nanoplastics with positive surface charges. Thus, positively charged nanoplastics accumulated at relatively low levels in the root tips, but these nanoplastics induced a higher accumulation of reactive oxygen species and inhibited plant growth and seedling development more strongly than negatively charged sulfonic-acid-modified nanoplastics. By contrast, the negatively charged nanoplastics were observed frequently in the apoplast and xylem. Our findings provide direct evidence that nanoplastics can accumulate in plants, depending on their surface charge. Plant accumulation of nanoplastics can have both direct ecological effects and implications for agricultural sustainability and food safety.
Keyphrases
  • arabidopsis thaliana
  • human health
  • risk assessment
  • heavy metals
  • climate change
  • magnetic resonance imaging
  • computed tomography
  • photodynamic therapy
  • drug induced
  • endothelial cells