Login / Signup

Evaluation of Auramine O staining and conventional PCR for leprosy diagnosis: A comparative cross-sectional study from Ethiopia.

Selfu GirmaCharlotte AvanziKidist BoboshaKassu DestaMunir H IdrissPhilippe BussoYohannes TsegayeShimelis NigusseTsegaye HailuStewart T ColeAbraham Aseffa
Published in: PLoS neglected tropical diseases (2018)
Our results showed that for diagnostic purposes, analysis of skin section is more sensitive than SSS, especially for samples with low bacillary load. AO staining on SSS and tissue sections was not significantly better than other routine diagnostic tests but considerably more user friendly. The sensitivity of PCR was higher than current standard methods and increased when combined with more efficient DNA extraction using mechanical and chemical lysis. Therefore, we recommend AO staining for the diagnosis of leprosy in lower health facilities such as health centres and district hospitals and PCR diagnosis at referral level and research centres.
Keyphrases
  • healthcare
  • public health
  • mental health
  • health information
  • primary care
  • flow cytometry
  • real time pcr
  • clinical practice
  • health promotion
  • circulating tumor
  • cell free
  • single molecule
  • soft tissue
  • wound healing