Prospective comparison between three TAVR devices: ACURATE neo vs. CoreValve vs. SAPIEN XT. A single heart team experience in patients with severe aortic stenosis.
Tannas JateneAntonio Castro-FilhoRafael A Meneguz-MorenoDimytri A SiqueiraAlexandre A C AbizaidAuristela I O RamosMagaly ArraisDavid C S Le BihanRodrigo B M BarrettoAdriana C MoreiraAmanda G M R SousaJ Eduardo SousaPublished in: Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions (2016)
In a "real world" registry, ACT compared favorably against the well-studied SXT and MCV devices in both safety and efficacy. MCV implantation was associated with lower device success rates and higher rates of new permanent pacemaker implantation. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.