Outcomes of "Anterior Versus Posterior Divisional Branches of the Hypogastric Artery as Distal Landing Zone for Iliac Branch Devices": The International Multicentric R3OYAL Registry.
D'Oria MarioGuilherme B B LimaNuno V DiasGiambattista ParlaniMark FarberNikolaos TsilimparisRandall DeMartinoCarlos TimaranTilo KolbelMauro GargiuloRoss MilnerGermano MelissanoThomas MaldonadoKevin ManiEmanuel R TenorioGustavo S Oderichnull nullPublished in: Journal of endovascular therapy : an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists (2022)
The results from this large multicentric registry confirm that use of the anterior or posterior divisional branches of the internal iliac artery (IIA) as distal landing zone for implantation of iliac branch devices (IBD) shows comparable profiles of safety and feasibility, thereby allowing to extend the indications for endovascular repair of aorto-iliac aneurysms to cases with unsuitable anatomy within the IIA main trunk. Although mid-term rates of device durability and branch instability seem to be similar, the rates of primary and secondary IBD patency at three years was favored when the distal landing zone was achieved in the posterior divisional branch of the IIA.