Cognitive Continuum Theory: Can it contribute to the examination of confidentiality and risk-actuated disclosure decisions of nurses practising in mental health?
Darren Conlon Bn Bcl Hons Llm Grad Cert University Teaching Grad Dip Legal Practice PhD Candidate U SydToby RaeburnTimothy WandPublished in: Nursing inquiry (2022)
Nurses practising in mental health are faced with challenging decisions concerning confidentiality if a patient is deemed a potential risk to self or others, because releasing pertinent information pertaining to the patient may be necessary to circumvent harm. However, decisions to withhold or disclose confidential information that are inappropriately made may lead to adverse outcomes for stakeholders, including nurses and their patients. Nonetheless, there is a dearth of contemporary research literature to advise nurses in these circumstances. Cognitive Continuum Theory presents a single-system intuitive-analytical approach to examining and understanding nurse cognition, analogous to the recommended single-system approach to decision-making in mental health known as structured clinical judgement. Both approaches incorporate cognitive poles of wholly intuition and analysis and a dynamic continuum characterised by a 'common sense' blending of intuitive and analytical cognition, whereby cues presented to a decision-maker for judgement tasks are weighed and assessed for relevance. Furthermore, Cognitive Continuum Theory promotes the importance of determining pattern recognition and functional relations strategies, which can be used to understand the operationalisation of nurse cognition.
Keyphrases
- mental health
- mental illness
- mild cognitive impairment
- primary care
- end stage renal disease
- case report
- healthcare
- systematic review
- white matter
- newly diagnosed
- ejection fraction
- chronic kidney disease
- health information
- prognostic factors
- multiple sclerosis
- patient reported outcomes
- climate change
- mass spectrometry