Login / Signup

Machine Ethics in Care: Could a Moral Avatar Enhance the Autonomy of Care-Dependent Persons?

Catrin Misselhorn
Published in: Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics : CQ : the international journal of healthcare ethics committees (2024)
It is a common view that artificial systems could play an important role in dealing with the shortage of caregivers due to demographic change. One argument to show that this is also in the interest of care-dependent persons is that artificial systems might significantly enhance user autonomy since they might stay longer in their homes. This argument presupposes that the artificial systems in question do not require permanent supervision and control by human caregivers. For this reason, they need the capacity for some degree of moral decision-making and agency to cope with morally relevant situations (artificial morality). Machine ethics provides the theoretical and ethical framework for artificial morality. This article scrutinizes the question how artificial moral agents that enhance user autonomy could look like. It discusses, in particular, the suggestion that they should be designed as moral avatars of their users to enhance user autonomy in a substantial sense.
Keyphrases
  • decision making
  • palliative care
  • healthcare
  • public health
  • quality improvement
  • endothelial cells
  • deep learning
  • pain management
  • big data
  • affordable care act
  • neural network