Perioperative venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in prostate cancer surgery.
Zachary KlaassenChristopher J D WallisLuke T LavalléePhilippe D ViolettePublished in: World journal of urology (2019)
Many patients who undergo radical prostatectomy will benefit from extended post-operative thromboprophylaxis. Risk of thrombosis is likely higher with open approach and extended lymph node dissection. The net benefit of treatment should be considered using patient- and procedure-specific criteria. When the net benefit is negligible or possibly harmful no pharmacological thromboprophylaxis should be used.
Keyphrases
- radical prostatectomy
- venous thromboembolism
- prostate cancer
- minimally invasive
- direct oral anticoagulants
- patients undergoing
- cardiac surgery
- coronary artery bypass
- pulmonary embolism
- case report
- squamous cell carcinoma
- robot assisted
- coronary artery disease
- atrial fibrillation
- sentinel lymph node
- rectal cancer
- replacement therapy
- surgical site infection