Does modification of portal pressure and flow enhance recovery of the recipient after living donor liver transplantation? - A systematic review of literature and expert panel recommendations.
Ashwin RammohanMohamed RelaDong-Sik KimYuji SoejimaMureo KasaharaToru IkegamiMichael SpiroDimitri Aristotle RaptisAbhinav HumarPublished in: Clinical transplantation (2022)
Considering all decision domains, the panel recommends pre- and intraoperative actual graft weight validation, portal pressure/flow measurements, and a comprehensive donor evaluation for the determination of potentially small-for-size/ small-for-flow grafts as mandatory . (QUALITY OF EVIDENCE: MODERATE | GRADE OF RECOMMENDATION: : Strong) Pharmacological PIM helps improve early renal function in LDLT recipients. (Quality of Evidence: High | Grade of Recommendation: Strong) In selected patients with SFSG, PIM helps reduce SFSS/EAD and sepsis. (Quality of Evidence: Moderate | Grade of Recommendation: Strong) PIM in the form of splenectomy has increased morbidity compared to splenic artery ligation (SAL). (Quality of Evidence: Low | Grade of Recommendation: Strong) In LDLT recipients with SFSG, PIM may help reduce morbidity/mortality. (Quality of Evidence: Low | Grade of Recommendation: Strong) In LDLT recipients with SFSG, modification of portal pressures and flows enhances recovery after LDLT. (Quality of Evidence: Moderate | Grade of Recommendation: Strong) This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.