The reimbursement process in three national healthcare systems: variation in time to reimbursement of pembrolizumab for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer.
Sarah Sharman MoserFrank TanserNava Siegelmann-DanieliLior ApterGabriel ChodickJosie SolomonPublished in: Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice (2023)
In this article, we focus on the reimbursement process, and as an example, characterize the time to reimbursement of pembrolizumab, a PD-1 immune checkpoint inhibitor for treatment of metastatic NSCLC from publicly available websites, in three different healthcare systems: The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) in the UK, the Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee (PBAC) in Australia, and the National Advisory Committee for the Basket of Health Services in Israel, all who have publicly funded health systems which include drug coverage. Our study found that there are substantial differences in time to reimbursement of pembrolizumab for the same conditions in different countries, with NICE and The National Advisory Committee for the Basket of Health Services in Israel approving one condition at the same time, Israel approving two conditions earlier than NICE, and PBAC lagging behind for every condition. These differences could be due to the differences in health policy systems and the many factors that affect reimbursement. Comparing the reimbursement process between different countries can highlight the challenges facing their health systems in early adoption of new treatments.
Keyphrases
- healthcare
- quality improvement
- small cell lung cancer
- public health
- advanced non small cell lung cancer
- squamous cell carcinoma
- health information
- palliative care
- affordable care act
- risk assessment
- emergency department
- electronic health record
- climate change
- health promotion
- adverse drug
- drug induced
- epidermal growth factor receptor