Machine-learning assessed abdominal aortic calcification is associated with long-term fall and fracture risk in community-dwelling older Australian women.
Jack Dalla ViaAbadi K GebreCassandra SmithZulqarnain GilaniDavid SuterNaeha SharifPawel SzulcJohn T SchousboeDouglas P KielKun ZhuWilliam D LeslieRichard L PrinceJoshua R LewisMarc SimPublished in: Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (2023)
Abdominal aortic calcification (AAC), a recognized measure of advanced vascular disease, is associated with higher cardiovascular risk and poorer long-term prognosis. AAC can be assessed on dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)-derived lateral spine images used for vertebral fracture assessment at the time of bone density screening using a validated 24-point scoring method (AAC-24). Previous studies have identified robust associations between AAC-24 score, incident falls and fractures. However, a major limitation of manual AAC assessment is that it requires a trained expert. Hence, we have developed an automated machine-learning algorithm for assessing AAC-24 scores (ML-AAC24). In this prospective study, we evaluated the association between ML-AAC24 and long-term incident falls and fractures in 1,023 community-dwelling older women (mean age, 75 ± 3 years) from the Perth Longitudinal Study of Ageing Women. Over 10 years of follow-up, 253 (24.7%) women experienced a clinical fracture identified via self-report every 4-6 months and verified by X-ray, and 169 (16.5%) women had a fracture hospitalization identified from linked hospital discharge data. Over 14.5 years, 393 (38.4%) women experienced an injurious fall requiring hospitalization identified from linked hospital discharge data. After adjusting for baseline fracture risk, women with moderate to extensive AAC (ML-AAC24 ≥ 2) had a greater risk of clinical fractures (HR 1.42, 95%CI 1.10-1.85) and fall-related hospitalization (HR 1.35, 95%CI 1.09-1.66), compared to those with low AAC (ML-AAC24 ≤ 1). Similar to manually assessed AAC-24, ML-AAC24 was not associated with fracture hospitalizations. The relative hazard estimates obtained using machine learning were similar to those using manually assessed AAC-24 scores. In conclusion, this novel automated method for assessing AAC, that can be easily and seamlessly captured at the time of bone density testing, has robust associations with long-term incident clinical fractures and injurious falls. However, the performance of the ML-AAC24 algorithm needs to be verified in independent cohorts. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Keyphrases
- community dwelling
- machine learning
- dual energy
- polycystic ovary syndrome
- deep learning
- bone mineral density
- type diabetes
- cardiovascular disease
- computed tomography
- big data
- body composition
- chronic kidney disease
- magnetic resonance
- adipose tissue
- metabolic syndrome
- mass spectrometry
- pregnant women
- magnetic resonance imaging
- skeletal muscle
- convolutional neural network
- soft tissue
- bone regeneration