Login / Signup

Can fetal heart rate variability obtained from cardiotocography provide the same diagnostic value like from electrophysiological interbeat intervals?

Dirk HoyerAlexander SchmidtAdelina PytlikLukas ViehöferHernâni GonçalvesCélia Amorim-CostaJoão BernardesDiogo Ayres-de-CamposSilvia M LobmaierUwe Schneider
Published in: Physiological measurement (2021)
Whereas the predominantly vagally modulated beat-to-beat precise high frequencies of HRV are not assessable from CTG, we identified relevant related HRV indices and categories for CTG recordings with diagnostic potential. They require further evaluation and confirmation with respect to any issues of fetal developmental and perinatal problems in subsequent studies. This methodology significantly extends the measures of established CTG devices. Novelty and significance HRV indices provide predestinated diagnostic markers of autonomic control in fetuses. However, the established CTG does not provide the temporal precision of electrophysiological recordings. Beat-to-beat related, mainly vagally modulated behavior is not exactly represented in CTG. However, a set of CTG-specific HRV indices that are mainly comparable to established electrophysiological HRV parameters obtained by magnetocardiography or electrocardiography provided almost similar predictive value for fetal maturational age and were helpful in characterizing FGR. These results require validation in the monitoring of further fetal developmental disturbances. We recommend a corresponding extension of CTG methodology.
Keyphrases
  • heart rate
  • heart rate variability
  • blood pressure
  • mental health
  • pregnant women
  • risk assessment
  • climate change
  • human health
  • gestational age
  • case control