A Road Map to Various Pathways for Calculating the Memory Kernel of the Generalized Quantum Master Equation.

The generalized quantum master equation (GQME) provides a powerful framework for simulating electronic energy, charge, and coherence transfer dynamics in molecular systems. Within this framework, the effect of the nuclear degrees of freedom on the time evolution of the electronic reduced density matrix is fully captured by a memory kernel superoperator. However, the actual memory kernel depends on the choice of projection operator and is therefore not unique. Furthermore, calculating the memory kernel can be done in multiple ways that use different forms of projection-free inputs. Although the electronic dynamics is invariant to those choices when quantum-mechanically exact projection-free inputs are used, this is not the case when they are obtained via more feasible semiclassical or mixed quantum-classical approximate methods. Furthermore, the accuracy and numerical stability of the resulting electronic dynamics has been observed to be sensitive to the above-mentioned choices when approximate methods are used to calculate the projection-free inputs. In this article, we provide a systematic road map to 30 possible pathways for calculating the memory kernel and highlight how they are related as well as the ways in which they differ. We also compare the performance of different pathways in the context of the spin-boson benchmark model, with the projection-free inputs obtained via a mapping Hamiltonian linearized semiclassical method. In this case, we find that expressing the memory kernel with an exponential operator where the projection operator precedes the Liouvillian yields the most accurate and most numerically stable results.