Transperitoneal vs retroperitoneal minimally invasive partial nephrectomy: comparison of perioperative outcomes and functional follow-up in a large multi-institutional cohort (The RECORD 2 Project).
Francesco PorpigliaAndrea MariDaniele AmparoreCristian FioriAlessandro AntonelliWalter ArtibaniPierluigi BoveEugenio BrunocillaUmberto CapitanioLuigi Da PozzoFabrizio Di MaidaPaolo GonteroNicola LongoGiancarlo MarraBernardo RoccoRiccardo SchiavinaClaudio SimeoneSalvatore SiracusanoRiccardo TelliniCarlo TerroneDonata VillariVincenzo FicarraMarco CariniAndrea Minervininull nullPublished in: Surgical endoscopy (2020)
The results of this study suggest that both TP and RP are feasible approaches when performing MI-PN, irrespectively from tumor location or surgical complexity. Notwithstanding longer operative times, RP seems to have a slighter intraoperative complication rate with earlier postoperative recovery when compared with TP.