The objective of this study was to present results of kidney tumor treatment at Osijek University Hospital Center over a 5-year period and to compare the outcomes between patients treated with radical nephrectomy (RN) and partial nephrectomy (PN). From November 2016 until the end of 2021, there were 280 consecutive PNs and RNs included in this cross-sectional study. Exclusion criteria were nephrectomies due to non-oncologic reasons and transitional cell carcinoma. There were 229 RNs and 51 PNs, median age of all patients was 62.5 (range 34-84) years. In the RN group, there were 197 renal cell carcinomas (RCC), predominantly clear-cell subtype, while among others there were 8 multilocular cystic renal neoplasms of low malignant potential (MCRNLMP) and 6 oncocytomas and angiomyolipomas each. There were 44 RCCs, 4 oncocytomas, 1 MCRNLMP and 2 cysts removed with PN; median R.E.N.A.L. score was 5. RN group had greater tumor diameters and higher tumor grade, higher postoperative creatinine levels and complications of higher grade. There was no difference in median hospital stay (6 days) and follow-up (20 months). With regard to oncologic safety, preservation of kidney function and lower overall morbidity, PN should be preferred to RN whenever oncologically safe and technically feasible.
Keyphrases
- robot assisted
- ejection fraction
- end stage renal disease
- newly diagnosed
- healthcare
- rectal cancer
- radical prostatectomy
- patients undergoing
- prostate cancer
- stem cells
- single cell
- risk factors
- uric acid
- type diabetes
- adipose tissue
- insulin resistance
- bone marrow
- renal cell carcinoma
- smoking cessation
- patient reported outcomes
- minimally invasive
- climate change
- mesenchymal stem cells
- skeletal muscle
- replacement therapy
- glycemic control
- drug induced