Improved Detection of Small and Low-Density Plaques in Virtual Noncontrast Imaging-based Calcium Scoring at Photon-Counting Detector CT.

Purpose To investigate the impact of plaque size and density on virtual noncontrast (VNC)-based coronary artery calcium scoring (CACS) using photon-counting detector CT and to provide safety net reconstructions for improved detection of subtle plaques in patients whose VNC-based CACS would otherwise be erroneously zero when compared with true noncontrast (TNC)-based CACS. Materials and Methods In this prospective study, CACS was evaluated in a phantom containing calcifications with different diameters (5, 3, and 1 mm) and densities (800, 400, and 200 mg/cm 3 ) and in participants who underwent TNC and contrast-enhanced cardiac photon-counting detector CT (July 2021-March 2022). VNC images were reconstructed at different virtual monoenergetic imaging (55-80 keV) and quantum iterative reconstruction (QIR) levels (QIR,1-4). TNC scans at 70 keV with QIR off served as the reference standard. In vitro CACS was analyzed using standard settings (3.0-mm sections, kernel Qr36, 130-HU threshold). Calcification detectability and CACS of small and low-density plaques were also evaluated using 1.0-mm sections, kernel Qr44, and 120- or 110-HU thresholds. Safety net reconstructions were defined based on background Agatston scores and evaluated in vivo in TNC plaques initially nondetectable using standard VNC reconstructions. Results The in vivo cohort included 63 participants (57.8 years ± 15.5 [SD]; 37 [59%] male, 26 [41%] female). Correlation and agreement between standard CACS VNC and CACS TNC were higher in large- and medium-sized and high- and medium-density than in low-density plaques (in vitro: intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] ≥ 0.90; r > 0.9 vs ICC = 0.20-0.48; r = 0.5-0.6). Small plaques were not detectable using standard VNC reconstructions. Calcification detectability was highest using 1.0-mm sections, kernel Qr44, 120- and 110-HU thresholds, and QIR level of 2 or less VNC reconstructions. Compared with standard VNC, using safety net reconstructions (55 keV, QIR 2, 110-HU threshold) for in vivo subtle plaque detection led to higher detection (increased by 89% [50 of 56]) and improved correlation and agreement of CACS VNC with CACS TNC (in vivo: ICC = 0.51-0.61; r = 0.6). Conclusion Compared with TNC-based calcium scoring, VNC-based calcium scoring was limited for small and low-density plaques but improved using safety net reconstructions, which may be particularly useful in patients with low calcium scores who would otherwise be treated based on potentially false-negative results. Keywords: Coronary Artery Calcium CT, Photon-Counting Detector CT, Virtual Noncontrast, Plaque Size, Plaque Density Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2024.