Allogeneic stem cell transplantation is still a highly curative therapy in adults with philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukaemia.

The application of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and novel immunotherapies has improved outcomes in patients with Ph + acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL), and the issue of whether there is still a need for stem cell transplantation has become controversial. We performed a retrospective study to explore whether stem cell transplantation still held a place in patients with Ph + ALL if only imatinib and 2nd generation TKIs are available and affordable. A total of 292 patients were included. The median age was 38 years [range 14-64, IQR 28-48]. Patients receiving transplants (n = 216) had better rates of 4-year disease-free survival (DFS, 68% vs. 24%, P < .0001) and overall survival (OS, 72% vs. 47%, P < .0001) than those receiving continuous TKIs plus chemotherapy (TKI-chemo) (n = 76). In the multivariate analysis, male sex, WBC count ≥ 95 × 10 9 /L and PLT count ≤ 154 × 10 9 /L at diagnosis were significantly associated with poorer outcomes, and transplantation was significantly associated with favourable DFS and OS. In addition, the transplant outcomes were superior in any subgroup according to the number of risk variables. Furthermore, propensity score matching (PSM) analyses showed similar findings in the whole cohort and in age- and BCR-ABL1 level-based subgroups after the first or second consolidation. In conclusion, transplantation as a one-time procedure for adults with Ph + ALL patients remains important in countries lacking accessibility to third-generation TKIs or immunotherapies, regardless of the depth of the molecular response.