One-year outcome of robotical vs. manual percutaneous coronary intervention.
Constantin von Zur MühlenMarvin JeuckTimo HeidtThomas MaulhardtTau HartikainenAlexander SupadyIngo HilgendorfDennis WolfKlaus KaierDirk WestermannJonathan RilingerPublished in: Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society (2024)
R-PCI is feasible and safe. Compared to M-PCI, index procedure success rate is high, safety profile is favourable, and manual assistance was required in only few cases. At 1-year follow-up results for R-PCI vs. M-PCI considering mortality, rehospitalisation, morbidity and target vessel failure were equal.
Keyphrases
- percutaneous coronary intervention
- st segment elevation myocardial infarction
- coronary artery disease
- acute myocardial infarction
- antiplatelet therapy
- acute coronary syndrome
- st elevation myocardial infarction
- coronary artery bypass grafting
- cardiovascular events
- atrial fibrillation
- coronary artery bypass
- minimally invasive
- risk factors
- left ventricular