Comparison of the within-reader and inter-vendor agreement of left ventricular circumferential strains and volume indices derived from cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging.
Doyin S MansellEvelyn G FrankNathaniel S KellyBruno Agostinho HernandezJames FletcherVito D BrunoEva SammutAmedeo ChiribiriThomas JohnsonRaimondo AscioneJonathan W BartlettHarinderjit S GillKatharine H FraserAndrew N CooksonPublished in: PloS one (2020)
OsiriX and CVI42 gave consistent results for all strain and volume metrics, with no statistical differences found between OsiriX and ScanIP for mid-ventricular, global or basal strains, or left ventricular ejection fraction. However, volumes were influenced by the choice of contouring software, suggesting care should be taken when comparing volumes across different software.
Keyphrases
- left ventricular
- ejection fraction
- aortic stenosis
- magnetic resonance imaging
- escherichia coli
- heart failure
- hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
- cardiac resynchronization therapy
- mitral valve
- acute myocardial infarction
- healthcare
- transcatheter aortic valve replacement
- left atrial
- palliative care
- computed tomography
- weight loss
- aortic valve
- quality improvement
- contrast enhanced
- data analysis
- affordable care act
- decision making