Sex Disparities in Efficacy in COVID-19 Vaccines: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Alessia BignucoloLucia ScarabelSilvia MezzaliraJerry PoleselErika CecchinGiuseppe ToffoliPublished in: Vaccines (2021)
Sex differences in adaptive and innate immune responses have been shown to occur and anecdotal reports suggest that vaccine efficacy and safety may be sex-dependent. We investigated the influence of sex on the efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines through a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials on COVID-19 vaccines. The safety profile of COVID-19 vaccines was also investigated. A systematic review included eligible articles published in three databases and three websites. A meta-analysis of available data, stratified by sex, was conducted. Statistical analysis was performed using the Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman method, as well as influence and heterogeneity analysis. Pooled analysis showed significantly higher efficacy, measured as the rate of new COVID-19 cases, in men compared to women in the vaccine group (OR = 0.67, 95% CI 0.48-0.94). No sex differences were found in the rate of new cases in the control group (OR = 0.92, 95% CI 0.78-1.09). Safety profiles derived from pharmacovigilance reports appear to indicate increased toxicity in women. In conclusion, evidence of a potential role of sex in COVID-19 vaccine efficacy was described. It strengthens the need to include sex as a core variable in the clinical trial design of COVID-19 vaccines.
Keyphrases
- coronavirus disease
- sars cov
- clinical trial
- respiratory syndrome coronavirus
- emergency department
- oxidative stress
- climate change
- healthcare
- adverse drug
- single cell
- big data
- metabolic syndrome
- electronic health record
- mass spectrometry
- pregnancy outcomes
- double blind
- deep learning
- single molecule
- atomic force microscopy