Oncology health-care professionals' perceived effects of patient accessible electronic health records 6 years after launch: A survey study at a major university hospital in Sweden.
Jonas MollÅsa CajanderPublished in: Health informatics journal (2019)
Patient accessible electronic health records have been launched in many countries, and generally, health-care professionals have had strong initial concerns related to the areas patient contact, documentation practices and quality of care. Especially, oncology care was discussed in media when launching patient accessible electronic health records in Sweden. However, few studies have investigated clinician-perceived effects several years after the launch. A survey covering these areas, as well as supposed effects for patients, was distributed to oncology health-care professionals 6 years after the launch of patient accessible electronic health records and answered by N = 176. Results show that patient accessible electronic health records have had small effects within the covered areas, and that the area most affected was documentation practices. Very few significant differences could be found between physicians and nurses. A comparison with results from interviews and surveys conducted shortly after the launch of patient accessible electronic health records clearly indicates that the experienced negative effects are not as big as originally feared.
Keyphrases
- electronic health record
- healthcare
- clinical decision support
- case report
- adverse drug
- palliative care
- primary care
- mental health
- physical activity
- machine learning
- depressive symptoms
- mass spectrometry
- pain management
- big data
- quality improvement
- ejection fraction
- prognostic factors
- artificial intelligence
- patient reported
- drug induced