Addressing shortfalls of laboratory HbA1c using a model that incorporates red cell lifespan.
Yongjin XuRichard M BergenstalTimothy C DunnRamzi A AjjanPublished in: eLife (2021)
Laboratory HbA1c does not always predict diabetes complications and our aim was to establish a glycaemic measure that better reflects intracellular glucose exposure in organs susceptible to complications. Six months of continuous glucose monitoring data and concurrent laboratory HbA1c were evaluated from 51 type 1 diabetes (T1D) and 80 type 2 diabetes (T2D) patients. Red blood cell (RBC) lifespan was estimated using a kinetic model of glucose and HbA1c, allowing the calculation of person-specific adjusted HbA1c (aHbA1c). Median (IQR) RBC lifespan was 100 (86-102) and 100 (83-101) days in T1D and T2D, respectively. The median (IQR) absolute difference between aHbA1c and laboratory HbA1c was 3.9 (3.0-14.3) mmol/mol [0.4 (0.3-1.3%)] in T1D and 5.3 (4.1-22.5) mmol/mol [0.5 (0.4-2.0%)] in T2D. aHbA1c and laboratory HbA1c showed clinically relevant differences. This suggests that the widely used measurement of HbA1c can underestimate or overestimate diabetes complication risks, which may have future clinical implications.
Keyphrases
- type diabetes
- red blood cell
- glycemic control
- cardiovascular disease
- end stage renal disease
- chronic kidney disease
- ejection fraction
- insulin resistance
- single cell
- prognostic factors
- risk factors
- adipose tissue
- squamous cell carcinoma
- radiation therapy
- machine learning
- patient reported outcomes
- deep learning
- skeletal muscle
- electronic health record
- current status
- climate change
- reactive oxygen species
- artificial intelligence