Stakeholder perspectives on evidence for digital mental health interventions: Implications for accreditation systems.
Philip J BatterhamAlison L CalearBridianne O'DeaMark E LarsenDavid J KavanaghNickolai TitovSonja MarchIan HickieMaree TeessonBlake F DearJulia ReynoldsJocelyn LowingerLouise ThorntonPatrick GormanPublished in: Digital health (2019)
Empirical evidence should be the cornerstone of any accreditation system to identify appropriate digital mental health interventions. However, robust accreditation systems should also account for program and user safety, user engagement and experience, and fidelity to clinical treatment guidelines.