Partial refuges from biological control due to intraspecific variation in protective host traits.

Predicting how much of a host or prey population may be attacked by their natural enemies is fundamental to several subfields of applied ecology, particularly biological control of pest organisms. Hosts or prey can occupy refuges from natural enemy attack, but habitat or ecological refuges are challenging or impossible to predict in a laboratory setting - which is often where efficacy and specificity testing of candidate biological control agents is done. Here we explore how intraspecific variation in continuous traits that confers some protection from natural enemy attack - even after the natural enemy has encountered the prey - could provide partial refuges. The size of these trait-based refuges should depend on the relationship between trait values and host/prey susceptibility to natural enemy attack, and on how common different trait values are within a host/prey population. These can be readily estimated in laboratory testing of natural enemy impact on target or non-target prey or hosts as long as sufficient host material is available. We provide a general framework for how intraspecific variation in protective host traits could be integrated into biological control research, specifically with reference to non-target testing as part of classical biological control programs. As a case study, we exposed different host clutch sizes of target (pest) and non-target (native species) stink bug (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) species to a well-studied exotic biocontrol agent, the egg parasitoid Trissolcus japonicus (Hymenoptera: Scelionidae). Although we observed several behavioural and reproductive responses to variation in host egg mass size by T. japonicus, they did not translate to increases in predicted refuge size (proportion host survival) large enough to change the conclusions of non-target testing. We encourage researchers to investigate intraspecific variation in a wider variety of protective host and prey traits and their consequences for refuge size. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.