Percutaneous electrical nerve field stimulation for adolescents with irritable bowel syndrome: Cost-benefit and cost-minimization analysis.
Eric D ShahShanti EswaranKimberly HarerAllen LeeBorko NojkovPrashant SinghWilliam D CheyPublished in: Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition (2024)
Abdominal pain drives significant cost for adolescents with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). We performed an economic analysis to estimate cost-savings for patients' families and healthcare insurance, and health outcomes, based on abdominal pain improvement with percutaneous electrical nerve field stimulation (PENFS) with IB-Stim® (Neuraxis). We constructed a Markov model with a 1-year time horizon comparing outcomes and costs with PENFS versus usual care without PENFS. Clinical outcomes were derived from a sham-controlled double-blind trial of PENFS for adolescents with IBS. Costs/work-productivity impact for parents were derived from appropriate observational cohorts. PENFS was associated with 18 added healthy days over 1 year of follow-up, increased annual parental wages of $5,802 due to fewer missed work days to care for the child, and $4744 in cost-savings to insurance. Percutaneous electrical field nerve stimulation for adolescents with IBS appears to yield significant cost-savings to patients' families and insurance.
Keyphrases
- irritable bowel syndrome
- healthcare
- young adults
- abdominal pain
- end stage renal disease
- physical activity
- ejection fraction
- affordable care act
- chronic kidney disease
- newly diagnosed
- clinical trial
- double blind
- health insurance
- palliative care
- prognostic factors
- peritoneal dialysis
- metabolic syndrome
- type diabetes
- quality improvement
- study protocol
- radiofrequency ablation
- climate change
- adipose tissue
- wastewater treatment
- phase iii
- patient reported outcomes
- phase ii
- peripheral nerve
- health information