Login / Signup

Comparison between minimally invasive spine stabilization with and without posterior decompression for the management of spinal metastases: a retrospective cohort study.

Hiroshi UeiYasuaki TokuhashiMasafumi MasedaMasahiro NakahashiHirokatsu SawadaEnshi NakayamaHirotoki Soma
Published in: Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research (2018)
Patients treated without decompression had a shorter operation time, less blood loss, a higher rate of discharge to home, and lower in-hospital mortality, indicating a procedure with lower invasiveness. MISt without decompression is advantageous for patients with D3 or milder paralysis, but decompression is necessary for patients with D2 or severer paralysis.
Keyphrases
  • minimally invasive
  • robot assisted
  • healthcare
  • spinal cord injury